june 2003

return to current issue

Contents

events calendar

Jack Flash!
terrorist threat shakes up city council.

Ooh a Letter, We Love Letters!: with best wishes from wayne

Studio View: from five pin gallery

Talk Back to Jack: give peace a chance

More Talk Back: 'lowering the bar' to peace and enlightenment

Jack in the Pulpit: the devil's music

A Chip Truck Review: this
train don't go to paradise

French Fashion File: match the accessories to the intellectual

Jack Band Profile: here comes
the booty...

Jack Film Promo: night of 1000 corpses

Artists’ Talk: after the ball...

Ooh Another Letter, We Love Letters!: from artspace director david laRiviere

One Eyed Jack & Listings

Cover Art:
by laurel paluck

opens in a new window

check out these interesting and informative advertisements!
click name to open in a new window

Rhythm & Soul / Latin Furor

Ashburnham Rod and Gun Club presents on June 21...

All Funked Up

The Gravy Train

The Night Kitchen

Spiritual Direction: Paula Baruch

Van Allen O'Shea: Modern Decor for Home and Office

County Boy (a play)

Green Turtle Arts Camps

jack archive:
may 2003

advertising rates for the summer:

full page 6.5 x 8 inches - $50
half page 6.5 x 4 inches - $30
quarter page 3.25 x 4 inches - $20

no additional charge - 300 dpi grayscale .tif or .tiff file. Deliver it to one of us on cd.

no WordPerfect or Corel files, please, have mercy.

Scanning artwork? ugh. maybe.

get it on the web - additional $15 - can be in colour! If it's a .tif/.tiff - only $5!

get it out of MSWord - additional $10, include font files please.

any other kind of pain in the butt...negotiable. Contact well before deadline please.

questions about format? email me.

 
this page was last updated July 12, 2003

Ooh a Letter, We Love Letters!

from artspace director david laRiviere

Excerpts from a letter to the Editrix by David LaRiviere, Director of Artspace, springing from Petunia’s piece in JACK #1 re: arts funding.

".... As Canada swings right, the moneyed class has instilled a great fear into the general population that the poor are exploiting various agencies that receive public funding.

Within the Arts it has been my experience that this fear has led many of the same class of people, those who live off the table scraps of the extreme privileged, to espouse "Corporate" patronage without much thought given to the ramifications.

Artspace cannot receive money from a private corporation without justifying its activities in relation to the interests of the stakeholders of said Corporation. Period.

The only agency that is available to fund an Artist-run centre mandated to critique itself and the hand that feeds is Government, in theory at least.

The theory being that Government represents the interests of the people, the people constitute a culture, and cultural production (art of every stripe) constitutes the voice of the people - not just those who own shares.

Of course it would be awfully naïve of me to suggest that this is what government is or how it behaves, however, my friends, it is my firm belief that this is where we have gone incredibly astray."

to be continued? - JACK

also see wayne’s comments...